Sunday, June 26, 2022

Antisemitism with Chinese characteristics

Many bad ideas have made their way from the West to China since the two civilisations collided in the 19th century, but until recently antisemitism wasn't one of them. 

Unfortunately, it looks like this may be changing. The number of Chinese academics and media personalities recently espousing antisemitic rhetoric has become impossible to ignore. The latest example is professor Zhang Wenmu, from the prestigious Center for Strategic Studies of Beihang University, Beijing. He is a well-known political scientist and naval strategist, and also a "leftist" in the Chinese sense, in other words a conservative nationalist and statist.

In a weird bit of online commentary, translated by the excellent Israeli analyst Tuvia Gering, Prof. Zhang offered this astonishing take on events in Ukraine: "Why has Ukraine become Judaised, and why has Israel put up with it? It's because Wall Street wanted to plant a quasi-Israel in this problematic European region. Israel, like the US and UK, is a tool of Wall Street or, to put it another way, a moneymaking subsidiary of a corporation masquerading as a state. So what is the reason for Ukraine's Nazification? It was designed to sow the seeds of a world war in Europe. In the previous one, the Jews did not anticipate Hitler, whom they had helped to power, to turn on them. However Jews as people, as well as the great bulk of humanity, are merely tools for Wall Street's profits."

Zhang Wenmu is clearly no stranger to antisemitism: in August last year he wrote a rambling article which mixed conspiracies about George Soros, Covid-19 as an American biological weapon, and the Jews as a "people of usurers" who dominate the US. He even managed to throw in a few quotes from Marx's tract "on the Jewish Question", which many consider highly antisemitic.

If this sort of rhetoric were limited to Professor Zhang alone, it could be ignored as the work of a lone crank. Unfortunately, it is not. Examples abound. What is most concerning is that some of China's infamous nationalist influencers have decided to jump on the antisemitic bandwagon. The most striking example is Lu Kewen, a former factory worker whose rants have over the last few years amassed millions of followers across various Chinese social media platforms. 

In May last year, Lu Kewen published an article on his WeChat account entitled "What should we make of the Jews?". The "we" in question is of course the Chinese nation. The article is pretty much a rehashing of all the world's worst antisemitic conspiracy theories, but it also claims the Jews are "enemies of China". Predictably the Jews are charged with controlling the US and its "anti-China media", but they are also held responsible for the Opium Wars, with Kewen peddling the idea that most of the opium was actually sold by Jewish merchants. It is hard to imagine a more inflammatory charge in China, and misinformation like this could do real damage if it spreads. The article, which ends with an exhortation to guard against "Jewish infiltration" of Chinese media and finance, got dozens of thousands of likes, and at least a hundred thousand clicks, possibly far more (WeChat does not allow you to see figures over a hundred thousand).

Chinese vice-premier Wang Qishan on a visit to the Wailing Wall

Until very recently, this kind of anti-Jewish rhetoric was virtually unheard of in China. What seems to have marked a turning point is the latest conflict between Israel and Hamas, which took place in May last year. During previous rounds of fighting in the Middle East, Chinese diplomats and spokespeople stuck to bland and neutral-sounding statements, deploring the violence and urging restraint on both sides. This is hardly surprising when you consider that the Chinese leadership walks a fine line in the region, trying to remain friends with everyone, from Iran to Saudi Arabia, from Israel to Qatar, usually with remarkable success. In fact Israel and China enjoy blooming commercial ties, much to the annoyance of several US administrations.

Last year, however, China's "wolf-warrior" diplomats took Israel's bombing of Gaza as another opportunity to publicly blast the US. The main public faces of Chinese diplomacy turned to Twitter, now the world's primary arena for this sort of "undiplomatic" diplomacy, with Hua Chunying tweeting about how America "turns a blind eye to the suffering of the Palestinians" even though it "claims to care" about the "human rights of Muslims", while Zhao Lijian tweeted a picture of an American eagle dropping a bomb on Gaza.

This shift in tone seems to have little to do with Israel or the Palestinians themselves, and everything to do with a wish to get back at the US for daring to complain about China's treatment of its Muslim citizens in Xinjiang, with American criticism now painted as hypocrisy. Attacking the US for its one-sided support of Israel is an easy card to play, and will win you a lot of sympathy in much of the world. The temptation must have been too much to resist for the champions of China's new assertive diplomacy, in spite of the risk of throwing relations with Israel under a bus.

China's English-language state-media duly followed suit, with the Global Times publishing one of its infamous editorials on how the US held "undeniable responsibility" for the Israel-Hamas conflict. The rhetoric was mainly directed at America, rather than Israel, but at one point the editorial quotes a Chinese analyst as saying that US policy in the Middle East has "long been kidnapped by its Jewish community that serves the interests of Israel".

CGTN, China's main outward-facing propaganda channel, then published a short video entitled "Why does the US act as a diplomatic shield for Israel?" During the video, the presenter says "some believe that US pro-Israel policy is traceable to the influence of wealthy Jews and the Jewish lobby". He goes on to explain, in a pedagogical fashion, that there are, indeed, many rich Jews in the US, and that "Jews dominate finance, media and internet sectors". He adds "So do they have powerful lobbies like some say? Possible." But he then explains that the real reason for US support of Israel is not the power of American Jewry, but rather the fact that Israel serves the US's geopolitical interests as its main "beachhead" in the Middle East.

In spite of this conclusion, the video presents American Jews' control of the economy as a fact. It is likely that the people who made it simply did not realise how inflammatory it can be to talk about Jews "dominating finance". After the Israeli embassy in Beijing issued a strong complaint, the video was removed from CGTN's website.

The antisemitic tone of this sort of commentary may be unintentional, but it probably helped deliver the message to nationalist academics and bloggers like Lu and Zhang that the Jews are now fair game for their vitriol. It is no coincidence that Lu Kewen's rant came out in late May 2021, just after Israel's war with Hamas was over. 

What the synagogue in Kaifeng used to look like before it was destroyed in the 19th century.

All of this is all particularly unfortunate because China often used to seem strangely impervious to antisemitism, especially when compared to other forms of racist discourse from abroad. 

There is no native Chinese tradition of antisemitism, unsurprisingly for a culture so far removed from the monotheistic world-view. China's one and only "native" Jewish community, based in Kaifeng, was historically left alone until it assimilated of its own accord. European Jews who found refuge in Shanghai in the 1930s are said to have got along well with the locals, and Republic of China diplomat Ho Feng-Shan was later recognised for saving thousands of Austrian Jews from the Holocaust by issuing them humanitarian visas for Shanghai. Jews have never seen China as a hostile country, and with good reason.

In fact, over the past century China has developed an odd kind of "philosemitism". Many of the reformers and intellectuals of the early twentieth century, for instance Liang Qichao, admired the Jews as a resourceful people who had done well for themselves in spite of lacking a homeland and being persecuted. Many of them seemed to have believed exaggerated tales of Jewish wealth and influence that they heard from Europeans, but this did not cause them to resent the Jews. Instead, they wondered what the Chinese might learn from them. Sun Yatsen himself admired the Jews and sympathised with the Zionist movement.

This Chinese philosemitism is still alive today. On the (rare) occasions when I have brought up my Jewish roots in conversation with local people in China, I have often been told something along the lines that Jews are known to be "very intelligent". The Jews' presumed superior intelligence and education seems, in fact, to be the single most well-known "fact" about them in China. The stereotype of Jews being good at business also survives, but it is not seen as something negative, just as further proof of their smartness. These attitudes have given rise to an entire cottage industry of cheesy self-help books purporting to uncover the secrets of how Jews do business or how they educate their children to be so successful.

In spite of the Mao-era support for the Arabs, Israel has also sometimes attracted admiration in China. The Israelis are seen as a tough bunch who take no nonsense from anyone, look after their own and create first-rate technology, qualities highly prized by Chinese nationalists. There is no tradition of opposition to Zionism, a term that is not particularly well-known in China, either in English or in its Chinese translation (犹太复国主义, or "ideology of recreating the Jewish nation"). 

Of course, a philosemitism which is not based on any genuine understanding can easily turn into something darker, especially once you throw in the eternal stereotype of the Jew as a shrewd businessman. One only needs to see the CGTN video linked above, or the way that Fudan University historian Wen Yang, another egregious nationalist, responded to David P. Goldman's arguments on China's potential global economic hegemony: apparently Goldman (who is a secular American Jew) was "revealing his Jewish mindset that everything is commercial", and projecting the Jews' "parasitic business model" onto China.

The bottom line is that relations between China and the US are at their lowest ebb since the death of Mao, and the Chinese leadership has abandoned its long-held attitude of being guarded and non-confrontational in international affairs. Israel is obviously a strong US ally (although it manages to maintain decent ties with Russia and China), and sooner or later this was bound to be reflected in Chinese attitudes towards it and towards Jews in general, especially when it comes to the anti-Western nationalists who have the upper hand in public discourse. Unless there is a general improvement in China's relationship with the US and with the West, we may well see more of this "antisemitism with Chinese characteristics" in the future. 

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

These are interesting insights. I'm not sure that anti-Semitism is something that's just cropped up here in China. One experienced it in various places and forms in the early and mid-1990s, even at universities and institutes, and among students and scholars who should have known better. One experienced the same in the 2000s, often at the oddest moments, such as an academic conference or speaking with local Chinese officials. Some of that was expressly cultural, and only some of it then was tied to political or diplomatic circumstances.

In that connection, what you might be seeing is not so much an orchestrated campaign or anything especially new, but a collection of views that correspond with each other because one is looking for evidence that they exist. There always seems to be dissident and disturbing voices out there in both official and social media, with the replicating effect when someone posts something or writes an essay with political cover to do so. Then there's a spate, until the conversation is reined in by more powerful forces who've been alerted to it and heard complaints, or perhaps see that the commentary is aimed at much at them as the purported target (i.e., a Chinese official or a region where there is cooperation with Tel Aviv at the expense of some Arab countries or companies).

May I also add that ties between China and Israel are, just as you note, tense and unhappy in some areas, not the least of which you mention. But not all issues in the relationship are so fraught with animus. There are technological ties, agricultural cooperation initiatives, and sci-tech exchanges that remain robust. Those ties remain largely unaffected by the stupidity and calumny of a handful or so of widely or not so widely read commentators and analysts. In short, there's diversity in Chinese media, as you know. One can pick out pretty much anything at various moments outside of Party media and wonder if it is a tendency, a trend, or a resurfacing of something seen before.

It will be interesting to see if any of these anti-Semitic views gain traction or the scholars and analysts espousing them suddenly go quiet for a while. As you note, it's worth calling attention to, expressing concern and contemplating. At this point at least, it sounds familiar and reprehensible at the same time.

Thanks for posting your thoughts on your very interesting blog, and for allowing comments such as these.

Anonymous said...

There's also this recent news:

China, Israel free-trade deal, Beijing’s first in Middle East, in ‘last stages’ amid troubles with US
After discussions dating back to 2016, a breakthrough trade deal between China and Israel may be signed this year, showing that Beijing can ‘talk to both sides’

Deal could potentially open the door to greater access to Middle Eastern agricultural technology as parts of China have been devastated by drought and heatwaves

https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3191828/china-israel-free-trade-deal-beijings-first-middle-east-last

FOARP said...

Agree with much said above - anti-Semitism isn't something that just appeared in China and is often just an extension of general anti-foreigner sentiment. I'm thinking especially about Yang Rui's rant about foreign media being controlled by jews which just seemed to be of a piece with his view that foreigners in China were "snake heads" and spies.

Ji Xiang said...

@FOARP:

I think you might be right, in the sense that during times when Chinese society as a whole is feeling more nationalistic and hostile towards "foreigners" and Western culture, benign curiosity about these ever so intelligent and successful Jews is likely to turn into something darker. After all, the Jews are very much part of the West, and many of them currently live in the US, China's arch-nemesis.

@anonymous:

I must say that I barely experienced antisemitism and antisemitic views in China until recently, but then my Jewish origins are not exactly obvious and I don't often bring up the topic with Chinese people. I'm sure that silly and conspiratorial views about Jews, and of course hatred of Israel as a US proxy, have never been entirely absent.

Still, I think the spate of antisemitic rants that we've seen recently are indeed something unprecedented. I don't think it's "orchestrated", but I do think it's a reaction to a sudden shift in the tone of Chinese diplomacy and Chinese media towards the Middle East. By the way, CGTN and Global Times are very much "Party media". I agree that there are areas in which China and Israel have strong ties, and those ties won't be damaged by this nonsense.

Anonymous said...

You may well be right about the uptick in anti-Semitic statements. It would be good to see that reined in, but it's difficult to have much hope on that.

CGTN and Global Times (in English) are, to be sure, 'Party media', but it might be worth restating that their role is quite different from other platforms. Their purpose is to promote China's image abroad, while news agencies are there to telegraph the Party leadership's line to Party officials and the Chinese public.

Yang Rui is an interesting case in point where attitudes about Jews and foreigners generally are concerned. He was of course educated at a British university. During the period that he began to be especially outspoken about 'American hegemonism' and the need to only admit 'qualified foreigners' into China, his son was studying in the United States at a boarding school. Yang's hope, often expressed, was that his son, when old enough, would be admitted to Harvard.